Hello and welcome to TeacherFocus, the online educator community! Be sure to introduce yourself in the Teacher Lounge!
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 15

Thread: Falling Behind

  1. #1
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Midwest
    Posts
    353

    Falling Behind

    A historical perspective article I ran across. Makes some good points.

    CSW

    Falling Behind: How Can U.S. Students Get a Top-rate
    Public Education?

    by Neal McCluskey

    Neal McCluskey is a policy analyst at the Center for Educational Freedom.

    Public schooling has no future. However, there is hope for public education - but only if we stop thinking of it as synonymous with
    public schooling, which is a rusted, crumbling relic of 19th century thinking.

    What is the difference between public schooling and public education, you ask? Public schooling is what we have now: a system in
    which government agencies control every facet of primary and secondary education, from building the schools and paying teachers
    to purchasing the books.

    Public education, in contrast, does not require government involvement in running schools. The term "public education" simply
    implies that a good education should be within reach of all children, not that government needs to construct every school and
    dictate the curriculum in every class.

    Unfortunately, public schooling has gotten in the way of public education for more than a century. In the industrial era, public
    schooling was primarily designed to prepare children for unthinking, regimented factory work. Its function was not nearly so much
    to educate children as to mold them into a vast supply of automatons destined to populate the nation's furiously multiplying
    factories.

    We left the industrial age behind, of course, a long time ago. We now live in an era defined by globalization, computers and the
    knowledge economy, not smokestacks and assembly lines. Innovation and rapid adaptability - not regimentation - are the
    currency of the day.

    Despite this, our top-down, industrial school system remains. Public authorities still dictate where children go to school and what
    they are taught, while creativity and innovation are nonexistent. Moreover, hopelessly encumbered by onerous regulations,
    restrictive union contracts and political fighting, public schools do not adapt to the changing world around them. The authorities at
    the top, and the bureaucratic apparatus beneath them, have neither the incentives nor the freedom to keep up.

    This is not to say we haven't tried to fix public schooling. We have undertaken countless initiatives to retrofit the
    educational-industrial complex, especially during the last 40 years. We have tried bigger schools, smaller schools, block
    scheduling, schools without walls, New American Schools, traditional curricula, back-to-basics, smaller classes, outcome-based
    education - and the list goes on.

    The outputs, however, have remained the same. Despite swapping endless new components in and out and nearly tripling real
    per-pupil expenditures since 1965, students' scores on such measures as the National Assessment of Education Progress have
    remained stagnant. As a result, our children's standing in international comparisons has become a regular source of anguish.

    Nineteenth century public schooling simply has no future. However, for public education, the future could be bright. If schools are
    freed to innovate and compete, like the creators of Google, the iPod or the hybrid car, and parents are free to pick the schools
    they want rather than having to take the ones they are given, America could finally excel in education.

    Moreover, by ensuring that everyone can afford an independent education, either through tax credits, vouchers or some other tool
    that truly liberates parents, the ideals of public education could finally be realized. Best of all, American children's education would
    be built for the future, not the past.

    This article appeared in Press-Enterprise, February 5, 2006.
    "The man who enjoys marching in line and file to
    the strains of music falls below my contempt; he received his great brain by mistake--the spinal cord would have been sufficient." - Einstein

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Midwest
    Posts
    353
    I think I now "get it" thanks to Bitsy. I think you all believe when I post what seems to be (and in some cases ARE) cynical posts or articles about education, you all think that I'm fronting YOU out. NO! I know that you all here are the good teachers/educators. No no no! That's not the case at all. I'm just sharing thoughts and articles I come across with the hopes that we can maybe invoke change at the very best, and continue to be what's good and right with education at the very least. Really, that's all.

    CSW
    "The man who enjoys marching in line and file to
    the strains of music falls below my contempt; he received his great brain by mistake--the spinal cord would have been sufficient." - Einstein

  3. #3
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2002
    Posts
    2,455
    Stan! You learned something from little ole' me???

    Hallelujah! :P
    [url=http://bgjackofalltrades.wordpress.com]Jack of All Trades[/url]
    [url=http://bitsygriffin-algebra.blogspot.com]Algebra 1 w/ Mrs. Griffin[/url]

  4. #4
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    San Antonio, TX
    Posts
    906
    Stan, here's my take on this "choice" business.

    We DO have a choice where we send our kids to school. If you want your child to attend a certain school (or series of schools), you just need to plant your residence within the attendance area for that school.

    For example, my oldest son is in his last year in middle school now. The middle school he attends is fine, but the high school that he would have to go to is completely unacceptable for my standards. We are already planning to relocate before the next school year begins (and there are numerous others in this neighborhood who have done the same as is apparent by the plethora of realty signs). It may be sad that we have to go to those measures to ensure that our children have a safe and effective learning environment, but it is how we have chosen to deal with it.

    If nothing else, this system encourages people to strive for better jobs, better pay, etc. so they can secure the best in education for their kids by living in the right area (in which vandalism and drive-by shootings are unheard of). I really fail to see the problem with this logic.

    If all people had the choice of where to send their kids to school, the "good" schools would soon be overrun by pseudo-students who just go to school so their parents don't get fined by the courts for non-attendance. The quality that was apparent at the "good" school will quickly fade with the influx of trouble-makers.

    People that live near each other tend to have similar ideas about things like child-rearing. If a less-disciplined child moves into this sort of neighborhood, they are soon reformed due to the overwhelming pressure from ALL of the neighbors. The kid and his/her family then assimilate to be more like those around them, and the "good" school is not diminished in quality.

    Just my humble opinion.
    I've heard that four out of every three people have trouble with fractions.

  5. #5
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Midwest
    Posts
    353
    Well, it's still America, so yea, we have a choice. I made sure once I could afford a house, we'd move to the part of town where my youngest daughter (now 9) would go to the elementary school I wanted her to go to. It's in the "common people" part of town. I didn't want her going to the school where all the "Hoi Polloi's" kids go and end up having to associated with those snobs. On the other hand, I didn't want her going to the school of hoodlums, although if I had my druthers, I'd sent her to that one as opposed to the "Hoi Polloi."

    In the end, it's not all the school's job to "educate." The parent's additude and involvement is huge, regardless of the school. In fact, that may be the most important factor of all.

    CSW
    "The man who enjoys marching in line and file to
    the strains of music falls below my contempt; he received his great brain by mistake--the spinal cord would have been sufficient." - Einstein

  6. #6
    wag
    wag is offline
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Mid-Michigan
    Posts
    1,504
    Quote Originally Posted by C. Stan White
    I think I now "get it" thanks to Bitsy. I think you all believe when I post what seems to be (and in some cases ARE) cynical posts or articles about education, you all think that I'm fronting YOU out. NO! I know that you all here are the good teachers/educators. No no no! That's not the case at all. I'm just sharing thoughts and articles I come across with the hopes that we can maybe invoke change at the very best, and continue to be what's good and right with education at the very least. Really, that's all.

    CSW
    I was not not taking anything you said personally at all. that does not mean I will always agree with you, however.
    "What is popular is not always right; what is right is not always popular!"

  7. #7
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Midwest
    Posts
    353
    I don't "feel" the need to be agreed with all the time. So it's no big deal. People of education should be the most tolerant and open-minded of all. And despite our culture of "polarizing politics," it's OK in my mind to agree to disagree, even get a little heated from time to time, dust off, shake hands, and carry on. A trait our Founding Fathers had that we've seemed to forget.

    CSW
    "The man who enjoys marching in line and file to
    the strains of music falls below my contempt; he received his great brain by mistake--the spinal cord would have been sufficient." - Einstein

  8. #8
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    1,140
    I had a really long post but decided to shorten it to this. This article is clearly written by someone who does not get it. We cannot treat our children like Ipods, or anyother product. The minute we begin doing this we have lost all hope.

    As much as people gripe and moan about NCLB it has created, in a limited sense the competition you mention. If a school does not make AYP the students do not have to go to that school. They can go to any school of their choosing. This on top of the fact that students do not have to attend school in their district anyway, at least that is the way it is in AZ. Children here can attend whatever school they choose, as long as the parents drop them off or provide some sort of transportation. A school will only provide transportation within their district. Problems occur when students cross state lines and I think this needs to be changed.

    The problem I see with the argument is schools are not in the business of making money, and cannot be looked at in that light. I suppose a case could be made for test scores indicating profit, but how many of us believe those one time tests are any true indicator of what our students can do?

    opinions such as this do not consider the social situations of many students. While many can get to schools outside their districts many do not have that option. Those who do not have that option are usually the ones in the most need. No, I think this piece is wrong and poorly thought out.

    I did a search on the Center for Educational Freedom and it is part of the CATO Institute. A typical think tank out of touch with the reality of education.

  9. #9
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Illinois
    Posts
    2,248
    Quote Originally Posted by C. Stan White
    I think you all believe when I post what seems to be (and in some cases ARE) cynical posts or articles about education, you all think that I'm fronting YOU out. NO! I know that you all here are the good teachers/educators. No no no! That's not the case at all. I'm just sharing thoughts and articles I come across with the hopes that we can maybe invoke change at the very best, and continue to be what's good and right with education at the very least. Really, that's all.CSW
    I understand this. I am learning.

    I realize that there is the need to discuss the problems and inequities of education and within our public schools. Growing up in a family thinking that problems and feelings might go away if you do not talk about them has taught me something. Fruitful discussion is an important aspect in all areas of life for the betterment of society.

    I bristle at the thought of negativity being so dominant, though. I sometimes wonder if this is a part of some responses to some of your posts, C Stanley. Topics on educational forums sometimes remind us that as educators, we represent the profession to parents and tax payers. How we discuss topics with each other makes impressions upon others visiting and reading. Likewise, it has an impact in how we present ourselves and our stance in our face-to-face contact with those around us. It is important to hold the discussions about the problems, possible solutions, corruption that exists, etc.

    I also feel strongly that the positive elements also need to brought to light and discussed. Parents and the public need to hear our take on the terrific superintendents, administrators, teachers, and support staff. They need to hear what is right and celebrate the positives. If there is not the balance, the negativity will only compound.
    Worry is like a rocking chair: It gives you something to do, but it doesn't get you anywhere. (Erma Bombeck)

    http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v4...lgreenmm-1.jpg

  10. #10
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Midwest
    Posts
    353
    Certainly Banannas, I can feel and agree with your statements. There are wonderful things going on with education. My only wish is that it would become more universal.

    Hell, I can cite you lots of examples of what's "good and right" with my teaching venue (prison) as well as what's wrong. But my view is that no one really gives a rip about prison education in the mainstream, so I don't present it often.

    Prior to that, I worked for almost two decades with the kids no one wants to hear about or deal with - juvenile offenders and kids in trouble with school and/or the law. There again, some successes and lots of problems. Who really wants to hear about them? They were shuffled to be because no one wanted to deal with them. To a certain extent, I can understand. On the other hand, it's tragic.

    Teachers like us often discuss "irresponsible parents." To an extent, that claim is valid. However, in my experience, I've found not only that, but scores of parents who DO care deeply about when their child gets arrested and locked up, or suspended from school. The problem is that they are simply not very bright people and are frustrated because this in turn translates into being poor parents. They care deeply, they just don't have good parenting skills. It's tough.

    Ironically, I ran into a "kid" (he's in his mid 20's now) whom I had locked up and also had in my suspension school. Saw him yesterday and he always shakes my hand and speaks as we exchange civilities. I'm sure once he has kids, he'll be one of those parents who loves his kid, but won't be a very good parent. I run into kids all the time like this who seek me out to speak. They were smart enough to remember it wasn't ME who locked them up or suspended them - I was just there to try and modify their thinking and behavior to avoid future problems. Having said that, I can say that relatively few did go on to prison or lives of habitual crime - so I guess there was some "success" by not only me, but by the courts, schools, whatnot.

    The challenge for me in these abnormal work situations (what's normal?) is to not "hate" and stay professional. I've done well. I can recall only two in 21-plus years whom I hated (not as people, but from their patholgical fu*ked up behavior). Professionals don't hate. Hate is an emotion, and it's not professional to operate on emotion for it opens doors to trouble. I guess if I hate anything, it's when clients or co-workers or superiors KNOW they are being unethical and continue to "get it off." I have no patience for that.

    Just so you know my perspective a little better. I can cite you scores and scores of "success stories" behind bars and with public education's "throw away" kids.

    I'll leave you with one, however. I tutored a kid for one year because of a drug problem. I had him locked up twice for drugs. Once he became a young adult, he came to visit me and thank me. He was honest - he said he "couldn't stand me" when he was a kid because I fronted reality out to him and made him work. Now, he understood and thanked me. I was just doing my job. BUT, he went on to tell me where he was working and how much he was making, which was A LOT more than I was! Wahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!!!!!! He could have left that part out!

    CSW
    "The man who enjoys marching in line and file to
    the strains of music falls below my contempt; he received his great brain by mistake--the spinal cord would have been sufficient." - Einstein

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36